Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Clock The Wolf on November 14, 2012 at 2:42pm

It looks as if the strings may be pulling the bridge saddle forwards more than pushing it downwards. If it is, then the lack of enough of the  necessary downwards pressure could be your problem. The strings may need to angle down more in front of the bridge.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Walter Cengia on November 14, 2012 at 3:14pm

Ok so I'll shift the break angle to the centre of the bridge and see if that helps, thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shawn on November 14, 2012 at 5:18pm

You must make full contact with the rod and the saddle. They must mate up flat and true to get solid transfer from string to saddle to rod piezo. I had this same problem till I got them to match up. Any tilt will slow down the string vibration and give low volume.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Shawn on November 14, 2012 at 5:29pm

The wood saddle may also be soaking up the string vibration as well try a bone saddle on a really hard pcs of plastic like plexiglass. This should solve the problem. I tried a wood saddle my first time with a rod and then switched to a hard plastic chop stick ( that fell in my pocket from PF Chang ) and had great results the volume was right and sounded great. This was on my built Victoria.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Busyhands Slim on November 14, 2012 at 5:43pm

This was my thought, too. I have a bone saddle on a CB Gitty piezo and it's really, really loud. Maybe I should try a wood one - it would be a lot easier than installing a volume pot!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Walter Cengia on November 14, 2012 at 5:56pm

Sooooo gee, you were in PF Chang's and you thought to your self wow these chop sticks a gonna make a great bridge saddle and one just fell into your pocket and I'll bet they're still scouring the place looking for it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Walter Cengia on November 15, 2012 at 7:59pm

Ok so here's the latest and it is better but not what I expected, and the low string is considerably quieter.

Is there a specific orientation requirement for these rod pickups?

more photos

Attachments:

• Bridge1.jpg, 46 KB
• Bridge2.jpg, 369 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ron "Oily" Sprague on November 15, 2012 at 10:47pm

'Nother thought: make sure your strings are sitting precisely over the highest points on the rod; otherwise, you'll lose some volume.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Randy S. Bretz on November 16, 2012 at 12:22am

You`ll get a much better sound if the saddle is bone. Using wood will mute the sound. I put an edge on the saddle so there`s just a small spot where the strings lay on it and a slight slot just enough that the strings won`t slide on the saddle . You want to keep the rod in the bridge slot loose and the saddle too - no glue in. As far as having the strings fall on the high part of the rod makes no difference being the saddle lays on the rods length evenly.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RTZGUITARS on November 16, 2012 at 9:07am

is that plexiglass for a saddle Like Randy said bone you can get clean bone at the pet store or stewmac.

Also build your bridge base higher it would help if the saddle wasn't so tall. This is one of Randy's see the saddle is short much more stable.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Greg Roberts on November 18, 2012 at 5:14am

I used a brass pipe nipple that the rod would fit in and then filled it with silicone and put end caps on it and used that as my bridge really good volume

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Walter Cengia on November 18, 2012 at 12:18pm

Thanks for all the advice guys, I'm in the process of trying all your ideas out but I'm starting to think that I may just have a bad batch of rods or maybe I'm expecting too much because when I say low volume I mean it's like 4 to 6 time quieter than a disk. I need to turn the amp up to the point of annoying ac hum to achieve half reasonable sound. I haven't tried all ten rods but I will and I'll keep pushing on but some thing tells me I'll be going back to my hand wound mini humbuckers.

Cheers

Walt

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page