Say, in a fiddle, there is a bass bar of wood running in the top, inside, just under the foot of the bass strings.

Would such a beast be helpful in bringing out those lost bass tones in a cbg? I have never made even something similar twice in a row, so I can only compare apples to oranges. Maybe you builders with dozens behind you might have some insight.

Views: 1068

Replies to This Discussion

I think in general a really wide bridge just adds mass to the top and damps vibrations. Violins have a really small bridge footprint on the top. Banjos also have a very small bridge foot print. Guitars with tailpieces also have small bridge footprint (except the Telecaster, but that is a special case related to the pick up.)

However if the bridge is glued to the top as in many acoustic and classical guitars, you need a glue patch large enough to prevent the strings from tearing the bridge off the instrument top.

Think of the top of your instrument as the cone of a speaker. You want it to vibrate as freely as possible.

Best Regards,

Steven
Diane said:
Well, thanks! That's very helpful. So how does a really wide bridge affect things? Lately I've got bridges several inches wide and am thinking that is making things louder. However, again, since I have never built the same thing twice, apples to oranges . . .

(My fiddle is coming along, slowly, but coming along . . .)
Very informative. I tried a new (to me) pick up mounting in my recent 3 string. Piezo mounted by cutting a wine cork and sandwiching element between cork, top and back of box. After snooping around in here, I'll be removing that and freeing up the top I tried so hard to keep free in the first place. I think that will make it sound even better un-plugged.
Thanks!
Amen, Steven.
What you said was elegant in its simplicity.
i am a novice player and a novice cbg builder. I am, however, in my Golden Years, as 'they' say.
To my eyes and ears, what you said was particularly profound...it is very commonly ignored, perhaps because of its very simplicity.

"Look carefully at traditional acoustic instruments that work well.
Notice the various dimensions mentioned above in relation to each other.
Try to emulate these proportions in the instrument you are building.

It is the relationships of these factors that count, not the exageration of any one of them".
thanks for voicing that...zan.
this is actually a response to Mark aka Junk Box Instruments.
i posted it as a blog, but it has not appeared...sooo...

Mark wanted to know more about what i said about proportions... and do i measure or eyeball it ?
I do measure, but eye-balling is ok, too.

My basic premises are these:
'the box' is an amplifier.
'the stick', with hardware, is The Machine.

Why Proportions ?
the most efficient way to get the Box and/or Stick to resonate or 'amplify,' is to 'feed' them 'vibrating lengths' to which they might be most sympathetic....
this minimizes the energy needed to 'push' them to getting them to vibrate and to keep them vibrating.

The Box:
the length of the box is my Basic Unit... i generally round that out to an average between the inside length of box and outside length.
my Scale Length is a WHOLE NUMBER multiple of the Basic Unit.
eg: if BU is 8 inches, Scale Lengths would be 1,2,3,4,5,etc, times as long as the box...... 8 inches, 16 inches, 24 inches,32 inches, and 40 inches, etc.

The Stick:
i choose, or calculate a Scale Length...
i divide that Scale Length value by 4 to get a Stick Unit.
eg: 16 inch Scale Length = 4 inch Stick Unit.

Total Stick Length is equal to 6 Stick Units.
1 Stick Unit is headstock.
4 Stick Units from nut to bridge...(Scale Length).
1 Stick Unit from bridge to tail end.

The Result:
Scale Length is both proportional to the Box and proportional to the Stick .
the possibility of resonance is enhanced;
the possibility of dampening is reduced.
.....resonance is the most efficient way to transfer energy.

To Finish:
a person could place the center of the box directly under the bridge.
i prefer to mount the box so that the bridge sits from 2/3 to 3/4 of the way down the length of the box towards the tail....

i use movable bridges...
experimenting is a great part of this adventure...
i measured LOTS of instruments to see what their proportions were... then, i experimented lots.

thanks for asking, Mark...........zandi z.




Zandi Z said:
Amen, Steven.
What you said was elegant in its simplicity.
i am a novice player and a novice cbg builder. I am, however, in my Golden Years, as 'they' say.
To my eyes and ears, what you said was particularly profound...it is very commonly ignored, perhaps because of its very simplicity.

"Look carefully at traditional acoustic instruments that work well.
Notice the various dimensions mentioned above in relation to each other.
Try to emulate these proportions in the instrument you are building.

It is the relationships of these factors that count, not the exageration of any one of them".
thanks for voicing that...zan.
I am on my 2nd guitar and wanted to try and make it louder unplugged and to try and improve the tone quality. I have seen classical guitars with a double top. SSOO I made a frame out of paint stur stick wood and used mono kote to cover it..like a membrane ,I drilled some small holes under the saddle thru the top of the box. i glued two small dowels in the holes so that they would contact the bridge..and attached the membrane box to the dowels on one end and the neck on the other. We will see if it makes it louder..or changes the tone quality.
This advice of keeping the components of a CBG in proportion with each other makes sense to me at a gut level. After all, the head, neck, and "tail end" of the "stick" are like the transmission medium and when the wave reaches the end of the stick, it is reflected back and this can, at various points along the neck make the signals add together in strength (creating a standing wave) or it can wipe out the signal, or (usually) do something in between -- usually either degrade the signal a bit, or just not be strong as it could be (compare to the points where there are standing waves). In computer/network cabling situations, we need to terminate the cable with resistors that closely match the impedance of the cable to minimize the reflection, as it tends to degrade the basic signal strength (and we basically ignore the signal boosting additive effect that reflections can also give us). With a guitar neck, I don't even know how one would go about terminating them to effectively eliminate the reflection, and for amplification reasons, we may decide that we don't want to. The trick then is to find the right length of the "stick" (head, neck and tailpiece) that will set up a standing wave in the area of our resonator (cigar box) so that it can be experiencing maximal signal strength (vibration) when we pluck a string. But, then with CBGs, we are talking 3, 4, or 6 stings all tuned differently, and our model suddenly gets too complicated for my simple mind to comprehend. Well, I wish I were better versed in physics so I could give you an answer, but perhaps that's what this proportion formula is trying to do. Does this supposition create any more ideas we can discuss?

-Rand.



Zandi Z said:
this is actually a response to Mark aka Junk Box Instruments.
i posted it as a blog, but it has not appeared...sooo...

Mark wanted to know more about what i said about proportions... and do i measure or eyeball it ?
I do measure, but eye-balling is ok, too.

My basic premises are these:
'the box' is an amplifier.
'the stick', with hardware, is The Machine.

Why Proportions ?
the most efficient way to get the Box and/or Stick to resonate or 'amplify,' is to 'feed' them 'vibrating lengths' to which they might be most sympathetic....
this minimizes the energy needed to 'push' them to getting them to vibrate and to keep them vibrating.

The Box:
the length of the box is my Basic Unit... i generally round that out to an average between the inside length of box and outside length.
my Scale Length is a WHOLE NUMBER multiple of the Basic Unit.
eg: if BU is 8 inches, Scale Lengths would be 1,2,3,4,5,etc, times as long as the box...... 8 inches, 16 inches, 24 inches,32 inches, and 40 inches, etc.

The Stick:
i choose, or calculate a Scale Length...
i divide that Scale Length value by 4 to get a Stick Unit.
eg: 16 inch Scale Length = 4 inch Stick Unit.

Total Stick Length is equal to 6 Stick Units.
1 Stick Unit is headstock.
4 Stick Units from nut to bridge...(Scale Length).
1 Stick Unit from bridge to tail end.

The Result:
Scale Length is both proportional to the Box and proportional to the Stick .
the possibility of resonance is enhanced;
the possibility of dampening is reduced.
.....resonance is the most efficient way to transfer energy.

To Finish:
a person could place the center of the box directly under the bridge.
i prefer to mount the box so that the bridge sits from 2/3 to 3/4 of the way down the length of the box towards the tail....

i use movable bridges...
experimenting is a great part of this adventure...
i measured LOTS of instruments to see what their proportions were... then, i experimented lots.

thanks for asking, Mark...........zandi z.




Zandi Z said:
Amen, Steven.
What you said was elegant in its simplicity.
i am a novice player and a novice cbg builder. I am, however, in my Golden Years, as 'they' say.
To my eyes and ears, what you said was particularly profound...it is very commonly ignored, perhaps because of its very simplicity.

"Look carefully at traditional acoustic instruments that work well.
Notice the various dimensions mentioned above in relation to each other.
Try to emulate these proportions in the instrument you are building.

It is the relationships of these factors that count, not the exageration of any one of them".
thanks for voicing that...zan.
I posted yesterday in another group discussion about this exact topic, strange I found it here. Anyways this is what I've noticed. My first five builds, I glued a 1x1 to the inside of the bottom of the box, then inserted a 1/4x2 on top of it, running the length of the box and cut slots...action is lower than usual. The next five builds I cut the slots the "traditional" way but cutting from the top inside of the box and glued directly to the body. On the first five, the body is supported by the bracing as I thought this may reduce neck tension by distributing it through the body and in turn what I have noticed is that the bracing supports extra tone even though it reduces the inside airspace of the box.

RSS

The Essential Pages

New to Cigar Box Nation? How to Play Cigar Box GuitarsFree Plans & How to Build Cigar Box GuitarsCigar Box Guitar Building Basics

Site Sponsor

Recommended Links & Resources


Discussion Forum

Resonator Ukulele

Started by John Hopper. Last reply by Order99 Jul 9, 2020. 1 Reply

Innards - reinforcements, struts and bass bars?

Started by Diane in Chicago. Last reply by Dustin Smith Oct 25, 2010. 19 Replies

bridges - materials - setup etc.

Started by David Beede. Last reply by Dustin Smith Oct 25, 2010. 15 Replies

Box construction materials

Started by MichaelS Country Boy Guitars Mar 10, 2010. 0 Replies

sound absortion inside box

Started by bucky. Last reply by David Beede Sep 8, 2009. 1 Reply

Latest Activity

A.D.EKER commented on A.D.EKER's video
Thumbnail

Im Troubled (Tribute) Mc K Morganfield by BCB - A.D .Eker 2024.

"Thank you Poorness ! for loving it ! appreciated!"
15 hours ago
Southern Ray replied to Timothy Hunter's discussion just came accross this pickup idea on youtube.
" Very interesting. Thank you Timothy!"
15 hours ago
Kent Thurston updated their profile
16 hours ago
Southern Ray posted a photo

Punch Project!

She now sports gold metal CBGitty knobs, speaker and an Artec 2.5 watt speaker. Finished this in…
17 hours ago
Southern Ray posted a photo

Project Punch!

Gonna finally get back on this long-delayed project that is more than half complete. (The matching…
17 hours ago
Poorness Studios liked A.D.EKER's video
19 hours ago
BrianQ. left a comment for Rob (Uker) Porras
"Hope this helps?"
19 hours ago
Doug Thorsvik commented on Doug Thorsvik's photo
Thumbnail

Dueling Flatheads

"I appreciate the kind words Papa D! I have always loved the look of these cigar boxes. Glad to have…"
21 hours ago
A.D.EKER commented on A.D.EKER's video
yesterday
A.D.EKER posted a video

Im Troubled (Tribute) Mc K Morganfield by BCB - A.D .Eker 2024.

The recorded History By Alan Lomax for the library of Congres of the Blues, from Mc Kinley Morganfield (Aka Muddy Waters) the in this take recorded Tribute ...
yesterday
Papa D commented on Doug Thorsvik's photo
Thumbnail

Dueling Flatheads

"Beautiful..Nice work Doug.."
yesterday
Papa D commented on Papa D's photo
Thumbnail

american1 Sun Glo

"Thanx AGP & Doug..  4 more coming soon"
yesterday

Events

Music

© 2024   Created by Ben "C. B. Gitty" Baker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

\uastyle>\ud/** Scrollup **/\ud.scrollup {\ud background: url("https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/963882636?profile=original") no-repeat scroll 0 0 transparent;\ud bottom: 25px;\ud display: inline !important;\ud height: 40px;\ud opacity: 0.3 !important;\ud position: fixed;\ud right: 30px;\ud text-indent: -9999px;\ud width: 40px;\ud z-index: 999;\ud}\ud.scrollup:hover {\ud opacity:0.99!important;\ud}\ud \uascript type="text/javascript">\ud x$(document).ready(function(){\ud x$(window).scroll(function(){\ud if (x$(this).scrollTop() > 100) {\ud x$('.scrollup').fadeIn();\ud } else {\ud x$('.scrollup').fadeOut();\ud }\ud });\ud x$('.scrollup').click(function(){\ud x$("html, body").animate({ scrollTop: 0 }, 600);\ud return false;\ud });\ud });\ud \ua!-- End Scroll Up -->